Linux distros not all that secure after all then?

Discussion in 'DIY Computers' started by treblesix, Jun 2, 2011.

  1. treblesix

    treblesix Guest

    treblesix, Jun 2, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  2. treblesix

    Mark Guest


    I got to the bit where it claims to be designed to protect against
    zero day threats and then gave up reading. No prizes for guessing
    (\__/) M.
    (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
    (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
    posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
    everyone you will need use a different method of posting.
    Mark, Jun 3, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  3. treblesix

    Daniel James Guest

    Nice to see that Linux is now getting to be so popular that it's worth
    the while of the snake-oil salesmen to target it!

    In fairness I don't know anything about ASL. It may be that it's a
    useful tool for configuring Linux to be secure, but most of the
    security techniques it uses seem to be things that Linux provides out-
    of-the-box ... though you *do* have to set them up correctly for them
    to be any use (and not all are, by default).

    Daniel James, Jun 3, 2011
  4. There are a number of 'security patches' around, presumably ASL (whoever
    they are) use one or more of those.

    An example would be:
    Richard Kettlewell, Jun 3, 2011
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.