In article < .com>,
says...
>
>Have what is probably a pretty basic question about setting up a SAN.
>
>First off, I'm a networking guy at a fairly small but growing
>company.
>We (like everyone else on the planet
) have a great deal of data
>which needs to be centralized and archived. I'm looking at the HP
>MSA1000 to meet our needs.
>Separation of the data itself from the servers (All 10 of them) would
>make management significantly easier, and disaster recovery would be
>vastly simplified. We want to either mirror the contents of each of the
>server's drives onto the SAN or migrate everything over to be running
>over the SAN. This is my personal opinion; need to talk to the boss.
>
>My question now is this:
>Do I need to get a fiber channel adapter for each of these servers, or
>could I just attach it to the preexisting copper gigabit Ethernet which
>connects all of the servers? I would just as soon avoid another ten
>grand in fiber adapter cards.
>
>Also, any recommendations regarding which tape backup drives I should
>look at for server-less backups if I go with the MSA1000?
>
not forgetting that SAN applies to iSCSI also, if you want all of
your servers to have access to the RAID on a Fibre Channel SAN
then you need to buy one HBA for each server
& i'd forget about "serverless backup"
even though it's been touted for years all you'l ever probably
get is "lan free backup" if you have a Fibre Channel SAN
Lastly, LTO has won the battle & AND both LTO-2 & 3 come with native
Fibre Channel interfaces
_____ . .
' \\ . . |>>
O// . . |
\_\ . . |
| | . . . |
/ | .
www.EvenEnterprises.com . . . |
/ .|
. . . |
/ . | 310-544-9439 / 310-544-9309 fax . . . o
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized - DIRECT VAR/VAD/Distributor for new SCSI/FC-AL peripherals
NAS/SAN/RAID from HP, IBM, Seagate, EMC, QLogic, ATL, OverLand Data