Computer Help Forums

Computer Help Forum > TechieHQ Office > Newsgroup Archive > Storage > [SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

[SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival?

 
 
Cydrome Leader
Guest

Posts: n/a
Thanked:


 
      Sep 18th, 09, 4:43 PM
"Derrick Coetzee <(E-Mail Removed)>" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm building a RAID solution for personal archiving (general large
> things like raw photos, full disk backups, DVD rips, that sort of
> thing). I picked up a 7-disk NAS tower that I'm filling with 2 TB
> desktop-class SATA disks. Much of this is irreplacable data - RAID
> failure would be very bad.


It would be bad to lose your raid, but you still need to back it up. Trust
me, a "NAS tower + desktop class sata disks" will fail at some point, and
you will lose all your stuff.

> The question I have is: is RAID 5 sufficient, or is RAID 6 needed?


5 would be sketchy for such large drives. 6 is better.

> Because this is for personal archival, the system would only be turned
> on occasionally (much longer per-disk mean time to failure), and in
> the event of a disk failure, could be turned off until the disk is
> replaced (it would never run in degraded mode). On the other hand,


you don't know that it won't run in degraded mode unless you have some
magic way to stop the array upon any failure, which really don't do you
any good anyways.


> rebuilding a 2 TB disk could take a while, and this interval could by
> itself provide ample opportunity for a second disk failure
> (particularly if my disks happened to come from a single batch).
> Should I play it safe and go for RAID 6 here?


yes, raid6 may be better. I'd suggest using a decent RAID controller if
you can too. Any controller built into a motherboard is garbage by the
way.

Again, you still need backups no matter what you do. you said it yourself-
the data is irreplacable. A RAID array can help reduce the chance of
HARDWARE data loss, but that's just one of many ways you can lose data in
the first place. It helps, but is never a complete answer by itself.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival? ArarghMail909NOSPAM@NOT.AT.Arargh.com Storage 0 Sep 21st, 09 7:17 AM
[SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival? Maxim S. Shatskih Storage 0 Sep 21st, 09 6:47 AM
[SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival? Ralph Becker-Szendy Storage 0 Sep 19th, 09 5:53 AM
[SOLVED] Re: RAID level for personal archival? David Brown Storage 0 Sep 18th, 09 9:19 AM
Re: What is: block-level and file-level Nik Simpson Storage 1 Feb 24th, 04 1:05 AM