In article <cvi5gu$rd1$>,
says...
>
> "Alan Gauton" <agauton-> wrote in message
> news:. uk...
> > In article <cvhsi5$ok1$>,
> > says...
> >> I've just purchased a USB2 memory stick.
> >>
> >> How do I know I'm obtaining the faster transfer rates of USB2 when I'm
> >> copying files - is there a way of checking easily.
> >
> > Depends - on Windows XP it'll flag up a message if it's plugged into a
> > USB 1.1 port, at least XP SP2 does anyway.
> >
>
> I'm getting the messages mentioned above when it's plugged into a USB1.1
> port but not when it's plugged into a USB2 port so at least that seems
> correct.
>
> To transfer a folder of 20mb takes about 10 seconds via the USB2 port and 26
> seconds when plugged in via the USB1.1 port. The difference is not quite as
> much as I had expected but it is definately quicker via USB2 as I had hoped.
Iirc, the throughput is supposed to be about 40 times faster - having
said that, you still have the internal hardware transfer, and the OS
start and stop of the transfer. I suspect if you tried a larger file the
differences would be more marked.
--
AG
Remove removes from address to remove anti-spam measures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Gauton E-Mail agauton @ postmaster.co.uk
Never for me the lowered banner, never the last endeavour!
(Damon Hill - 16th June 1999)