In article <3Xicf.6791$>,
rob.nicholson@nospam_unforgettable.com says...
> > Indeed, xp's remote desktop feature is excellent - I use it from laptop
> > to my desktops in the house - very quick ... I hate the slower responses
> > from vnc/dameware type remote desktops, they are more suited to remote
> > support than general use.
>
> I assume that XPs remote desktop feature borrows heavily upon the RDP
> protocol developed for the terminal server environment. If so, I'm not
> surprised it works well. Out of all the remote-access protocols around, the
> ones used with terminal server are head and shoulders above the rest.
> Citrix's ICA is even better. They should be though - I think they are linked
> in at a much lower GDI level than products like VNC which watch for
> rectangular changes in the screen bitmap using brute force methods.
>
> But terminal server isn't the solution the original poster needs - oops,
> wandered off there.
>
> Cheers, Rob.
>
>
>
He doesnt need a terminal server ... xp pro has this feature built in -
im using a w2k laptop with rdp to my xp pro desktop upstairs currently
.... yes, its all borrowed from terminal services and is excellent but im
only using the deesktops built in features along with the rdp client
software installed on w2k.
If anything get rid of xp home, upgrade to pro ... I wasnt aware xp home
wouldnt allow you to run the remote desktop client to connect to xp pro
machines, but I dont ever get involved with home - thats enough reason
for me to scrap home in favour of pro.