Bitstring <>, from the
wonderful person Paul Hopwood <> said
>"¬Stephen Hammond" <> wrote:
>
>>would this
>>http://www.dabs.com/uk/productView.htm?quicklinx=3144--
>
>>be a lot better than this
>>http://www.dabs.com/uk/productView.h...HNM&familyid=0
>
>A this clock speed a 533Mhz Northwood would, generally, be better.
>Prescott won't really come into it's own until Intel launch with clock
>speeds much faster than Northwood is capable of.
Which I guess they may never do now .. e.g. (borrowed from
News:comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips thread)
"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05...cancels_tejas/
Intel to 'ditch' Pentium 4 core after Prescott
Intel will today tear its Pentium 4 and Xeon roadmaps to shreds and
announce the cancellation of its 'Tejas' and 'Jayhawk' processors and
their successors.
Both chips represent what was to have been the next generation of
90nm
Pentium 4 and Xeon, respectively, and were scheduled to arrive in the
Q2
2005 timeframe. Chips derived from them include 'Cedarmill' on the
desktop, and 'Potomac' and 'Tulsa' in the Xeon series. The future of
these chips is now also in question.
According to Reuters, Tejas and Jayhawk are now history. The report
doesn't say what Intel will offer instead, but it seems clear that
the
chip giant has decided to accelerate plans to roll-out desktop
processors
derived from its Pentium M architecture.
"
--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
Outgoing Msgs are Turing Tested,and indistinguishable from human typing.